Does Fresh Content Truly Rank Higher? Latest SEO Guide - SCHOOLCONTENTS.info
==ADVERT==
Print Your JAMB Exam Slip
Let us help print and send your JAMB EXAM SLIP to you immediately for N500. Know your center, date, and time. Get it sent to you in just 5 minutes. Chat us on 08065152292 (WhatsApp only please!)
==ADVERT==

Does Fresh Content Truly Rank Higher? Latest SEO Guide

Freshness = ranking or not?
When you're delving into strategies to boost traffic on your blog or website, you've likely encountered the notion that fresh content enjoys higher rankings. By fresh content, I'm referring to recently published posts.

Yet, some experts like Adrian argue that it's not just about content's "newness" in terms of time since publication, but its novelty in meaning and the insights it offers.

For this discussion, let's consider fresh content as the latest releases, closely tied to up-to-date data. In this context, our views align with Adrian and others who emphasize content's substance.

Does posting fresh content truly lead to higher rankings? Do older posts risk slipping below the search results? Must you incessantly churn out content to maintain Google's top spot?

The answer resides in a blend of sentiments and findings. Some SEO experts conclude that new posts tend to reach page 1 quicker than older ones, while others maintain that time isn't a significant factor.

Google itself has voiced a resounding "NO" to this idea. But do I have something to add? Indeed, YES.

By the end of this discussion, you'll see beyond the surface and understand the reasoning behind John Muller's firm "NO." 

Why Crawling and Reranking, if Fresh Content isn't Favored?

Let's clarify something. In the realm of SEO, everyone understands how Google treats new content. You could be on page 1 today and drop to page 3 within a month.

Consider this example: a simple search for "best features of iPhone X" yields a staggering 341,000,000 results (at the time of this post). 

If you perform the same search now, you'll likely be astonished by the increased number of results.

While the results may vary in relevance, including search intent, what allows Google to rank some above others? The answer remains the same: relevance, quality, and more.

It's worth noting that some posts were written before others. Google's web crawlers continuously scour the internet for fresh content related to specific keywords. They analyze this content to determine where it fits in search rankings.

This process, while time-consuming for Google, is incredibly swift thanks to advanced technologies. When you publish a new post, Google:

  1. Crawl it to understand its content.
  2. Shows it to a select group of users to gauge their response.
  3. If users prefer your content over what's been published before, you retain your top ranking; otherwise, you're buried deeper in the search results.
  4. This testing phase clearly favors fresh content. Google elevates new posts to page 1 or the number 1 position, subject to the response of users.

Note, item 3 above, they show you a few people to "test run" your quality.

How do you define that? Is fresh content not favored here? Definitely YES!

Google brings newer posts to page 1 or number 1 positions by a quick ranking to know if you deserve the spot. If users say Yes, Google will never say No.

With this, Google favors fresh content with its quick test run of content quality.

Search Engines Prioritize Freshness for Certain Content

When you search for news-related queries on Google, you're presented with a page brimming with new content. Google prioritizes user intent over keywords. For instance, if a user searches for "terrorist attacks," they are likely interested in the most recent news on such incidents, not historical ones like the September 11 attacks.


In cases where keywords are specified, such as "history of America," an older post could claim the top spot in search rankings. This is because older posts on historical topics may have undergone multiple updates over time.

Users Drive Google to Rank Fresh Content

Search engines dance to the tune of their users, and their primary concern is delivering what users seek. Therefore, search engines prioritize user preferences, influencing Google to rank fresh content.

When a user conducts a search, they are presented with a list of results on page one. Among these, a result with the most recent publication date (freshness) is likely to catch the user's attention.

Consider the search results below. 


Most readers were likely drawn to the number 1 result because of its freshness. This emphasis on the latest date doesn't necessarily mean the content itself is entirely new. Some websites, like Business-Know-How, republish their posts with updated dates to maintain a fresh appearance. This can help with rankings.

If users are more likely to click and read posts based on the freshness of their publication dates, this results in higher rankings. It's a user-driven phenomenon. If you notice a dip in the ranking of your trusted posts, consider republishing them with the most recent dates to appeal to both new and returning readers.

Why Did Google Dismiss Freshness as a Ranking Factor?

Given all this evidence, you might wonder why Google states that freshness doesn't significantly affect content rankings. It's observed that John Muller provides direct answers on Twitter without delving into extensive explanations. If he says "NO," he leaves it at that.

In his further explanation, answering a related question, he emphasizes that old content being relabeled as new undermines an author's credibility. He stresses that good content isn't about shortcuts or SEO hacks; it's about respecting your content and users.

As a user, recognizing that old content is just being relabeled as new completely kills any authority that I thought the author/site had. Good content is not lazy content. SEO hacks don't make a site great. Give your content and users the respect they deserve.

Since John's responses are considered official viewpoints, it's essential to respect his statements, warnings, and clarifications. Nevertheless, if certain practices are effective and incur no official penalties, their impact may be minimal.

John's stance doesn't endorse laziness, deception, or clickbait. Instead, it advocates creating content that genuinely serves the user. Ultimately, it's the users' preferences that matter because, after all, we write for them, not just for Google.

Conclusion

To answer the question directly, yes, the freshness of your posts can indeed help you rank higher. While opinions on this topic may vary, catering to users' preferences is essential for success. If your audience favors recent content, don't neglect the importance of keeping your work up to date. If Google detects a lack of fresh content on your site, it's a signal that you might be falling behind in your niche.

In niche areas that require continuous content publication and regular updates, freshness holds significant power. So, remember that when it comes to content, staying fresh is often the key to staying on top.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Just type your comment and post it. It will not appear until it is checked by admins. Check back to see your comment live.

If you want an immediate reply, you can request a reply @ #1000 through WhatsApp only at (08065152292). No call, please!

Techie BEC Konsult 7:54 PM (0 minutes ago) to me